Eyed to excess

27th August 2010 at 01:00

The Scottish Funding Council, ever seeking to justify its continued existence, has written to all colleges in Scotland about apparent "anomalies" between audited and individual returns related to the use of student support funding.

It has instituted yet more "checks" on the fidelity of data being provided by colleges. In some cases, colleges are being asked to comment on variances of pound;1 or pound;2 - against spends of up to pound;250,000.

This is all very interesting but, in a post-Crerar era where public services were promised a "lighter touch" and a more "proportionate" approach to scrutiny, the level of interrogation of colleges does seem to have reached a new and all-time high.

Can Scotland really afford this degree of "oversight" in the coming age of austerity?

The old adage says that "if you look after the pennies, the pounds will look after themselves". In the SFC's case, it seems that if you look after the pounds, the billions will presumably look after themselves.

Ian Graham, principal, John Wheatley College, Glasgow.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now