Eyed to excess

27th August 2010 at 01:00

The Scottish Funding Council, ever seeking to justify its continued existence, has written to all colleges in Scotland about apparent "anomalies" between audited and individual returns related to the use of student support funding.

It has instituted yet more "checks" on the fidelity of data being provided by colleges. In some cases, colleges are being asked to comment on variances of pound;1 or pound;2 - against spends of up to pound;250,000.

This is all very interesting but, in a post-Crerar era where public services were promised a "lighter touch" and a more "proportionate" approach to scrutiny, the level of interrogation of colleges does seem to have reached a new and all-time high.

Can Scotland really afford this degree of "oversight" in the coming age of austerity?

The old adage says that "if you look after the pennies, the pounds will look after themselves". In the SFC's case, it seems that if you look after the pounds, the billions will presumably look after themselves.

Ian Graham, principal, John Wheatley College, Glasgow.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today