Faults scarce in royal borough

26th May 2000 at 01:00
Six reports on inspections of local authorities were published this week by the Office for Standards in Education, and only one was favourable - that for Kensington and Chelsea. Three councils were slated and two emerged with good points acknowledged

INSPECTORS had to search hard for weaknesses in the education service provided by the Conservative-run London borough of Kensington and Chelsea.

In the end they found one - ensuring and monitoring the provision of education other than that provided at school.

But even then, the Office for Standards in Education had to admit the council's 10-year campaign to improve schools in the royal borough had been outstandingly well-managed.

And its report points out that the sole criticism was set against many significant strengths which sprang from the "exemplary" strategy for school improvement.

Success has been achieved by schools against high odds, inspectors said, with strong backing from the council which poured money into its education service.

Kensington and Chelsea is a borough of huge contrasts, with areas of severe disadvantage and great wealth. Its unemployment rate is higher than the national average yet lower than the inner-London rate.

Twice the national average number of pupils are entitled to free meals and pupil mobility rates are very high, reflecting the number of asyum-seekers, homeless families and refugees in the area.

Many of its rich residents avoid Kensington and Chelsea's schools and, uniquely in this country, more than half (52 per cent) of the 21,300 pupils in the borough attend private school.

Yet Kensington and Chelsea's schools, according to OFSTED, provide a high quality of education with a much higher proportion of good teaching than is found nationally.

Pupil attainment is below average when they enter primary school, rises above the norm at the end of key stage 2 but drops below the national level for maths at KS3, because of a severe shortage of teachers.

At KS4, GCSE results mirrored the national average, inspectors said.

Pupil-teacher ratios in the 26 primary and four secondary schools were among the best in the country last year and, until recently, it has been paying above the inner-London rates for most posts.

Political leadership is praised as strong, well-informed and sharply focused on school performance and continuous improvement. Only one school has serious weaknesses.

KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA

Strengths

leadership

expectations of schools

performance management

strategic planning and management

training for school staff

primary literacy and numeracy

special needs

Weakness

education other than at school


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now