Finger fooled

24th January 1997 at 00:00
"Finger Maths" (TES, January 10) states how effective fingers could be as "calculators". But the author overlooks some necessary ground-rules that children need to understand before "finger play" can be used in such a sophisticated, abstract way.

For example, not all four and five-year-olds can recognise the number symbols to 10, so to draw a number on one finger can be at least confusing and at worst the beginning of the "maths blockage", which is still acknowledged by many adults.

Of course, we as teachers understand that when holding up, say, seven fingers, the last one indicates the total number in that set. Children are just as likely to raise only one finger and become confused because it is labelled "seven".

As for time allowed, the author suggests "little and often - 15 to 20 minutes a day". Allowing for the attention span of many young infants, five minutes before play and five minutes at "home time" would be more realistic.

Finally, "chanting" as a class is hardly likely to reinforce the basic numerical concepts, such as ordering or conservation of number. The end-result of mindless chanting is that many children "know the tune" but few know the words.


50 Sydney Road Bexleyheath Kent

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today