Flaw in life expectancy theory

28th February 1997 at 00:00
The figures for life expectancy for teachers who retire at various ages (TES, February 14) may give the false impression that a teacher can (marginally) enhance hisher life expectancy by retiring later rather than earlier. Thus, for example, a woman retiring at 60 can expect to live a further 25.8 years compared with 35.4 years if she had retired at 50. Thus, the impression is that early retirement is bad for your health.

The flaw in such reasoning becomes apparent when one remembers that life expectancy is based on averages. Given that some 50-year-olds die before they reach 60, the calculation for the 60-year-old "survivors" is bound to yield an enhanced figure.

If one wanted to find out whether early retirement per se enhanced the average teacher's life expectancy one would need the life expectancy figures for, say, teachers aged 50 who retire, to compare with teachers aged 50 who work on for at least several years.

PHILIP GOGGIN Senior lecturer Crewe School of Education Manchester Metropolitan University

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today