Flawed measure of performance

25th November 2005 at 00:00
I am writing to draw your readers' attention to the flaws in the concept of context value added (CVA) as applied by Ofsted in its evaluation of schools.

I appreciate the need to move from crude measures of attainment value-added measures. But CVA is based not simply on a pupil's progress, but also ethnic make-up, deprivation and gender balance. Yet these factors are mostly the same for pupils on intake as at the end of their time in school.

And CVA misses a crucial factor in a school's context, namely funding per pupil of which there is a huge variation.

The statistical basis on which CVA is predicated is also flawed. I assume that there is hard evidence to justify including ethnicity and gender as significant factors in a school's context.

I do not understand how the same can be true for deprivation: given that a pupil may be entitled to free school meals in Year 7 but no longer by Year 11, or vice versa, CVA also implies that we as a nation have lower expectations of ethnic minority and poor children and boys.

Philip Grady

Headteacher Bury Church of England high school, Haslam Brow Bury, Lancashire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today