Flawed measure of performance

25th November 2005 at 00:00
I am writing to draw your readers' attention to the flaws in the concept of context value added (CVA) as applied by Ofsted in its evaluation of schools.

I appreciate the need to move from crude measures of attainment value-added measures. But CVA is based not simply on a pupil's progress, but also ethnic make-up, deprivation and gender balance. Yet these factors are mostly the same for pupils on intake as at the end of their time in school.

And CVA misses a crucial factor in a school's context, namely funding per pupil of which there is a huge variation.

The statistical basis on which CVA is predicated is also flawed. I assume that there is hard evidence to justify including ethnicity and gender as significant factors in a school's context.

I do not understand how the same can be true for deprivation: given that a pupil may be entitled to free school meals in Year 7 but no longer by Year 11, or vice versa, CVA also implies that we as a nation have lower expectations of ethnic minority and poor children and boys.

Philip Grady

Headteacher Bury Church of England high school, Haslam Brow Bury, Lancashire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now