Forum's advice is well heeded

12th March 2004 at 00:00
I refer to the article "Funny meddling on the way to the forum" (TES, January 23).

The Leicestershire Schools' Forum actually debated the delegation of special educational needs money on four separate occasions. There was considerable disagreement.

Four members of the forum were "for further delegation", only one was "against".

There were five abstentions - two of whom were elected members of the cabinet who felt it inappropriate to vote as they were going to convey the forum's views back to colleagues before a final decision.

Ms Hardcastle's comment that "a forum's advice can be totally disregarded if it conflicts with local education authority policy" and "the authority ignored us (primary headteachers and governors) and is doing it anyway" is a touch naive.

The track record of the cabinet in Leicestershire towards the forum is good. Every bit of advice given has been adopted in the budget proposals for 20045.

On two occasions the forum has been split, and then the cabinet has made a decision on the basis of what it believes to be best for the service.

Jackie Strong

Director of education


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today