Full performance not sufficiently measured

10th October 2008 at 01:00

The inspectorate has candidly admitted that the way the performance of colleges is currently measured "does not reflect the full picture of the learning, achievement and attainment that takes place", in a report for the Scottish Funding Council on learner progress in FE.

Colleges have long argued that this is the case: for example, while student retention is regarded as one of the indicators of success for a college, success for the learner could be leaving for a job or a university place. Yet large numbers "dropping out", no matter how positive the reasons, have a negative impact on the perception of individual institutions.

The colleges also complained loudly to the inspectorate about existing data, forcing HMIE to report: "Overall, the sector lacks confidence in the accuracy of the data it collects, as a result of inconsistent practices across the sector." This, in turn, impacts on confidence in national statistics and benchmarking activities among colleges.

Although HMIE wants to retain performance indicators (albeit improved) on student retention, progress and attainment, it agrees that broader measures of achievement are also necessary.

The inspectors recommend that the council should work with colleges to develop a new measure known as "distance travelled" - how much progress a student has made. This would have to be "helpful and non-burdensome".

The report notes: "It is important to recognise that formal awards or employment may not be what individuals require from their learning. The absence of such a clear end point does not invalidate the progress they have made through learning."

Such progress could include the impact of learning on their lives, improvements in the way they feel about themselves and their relationships, development of initiative and involvement in the community. These could be assessed by tutor and self-assessment, scales of feeling or agreement with statements.

Although almost all colleges recognised the potential benefits of a distance travelled approach, in improving learners' confidence and motivation, their overall view was that developing national measures would be "challenging, difficult and highly complex, as well as expensive".

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today