Funding plea

31st October 1997 at 00:00
Until September I was the principal of a sixth-form college and currently I am the head of an upper school. I was therefore most interested by your front-page article on October 17 ("Small sixth forms under threat") indicating that 15 local authorities were preparing to trial the Further Education Funding Council funding methodology.

While supporting the principle of equality of funding, I do not believe the FEFC formula is appropriate. It is over-complicated and bureaucratic and its application is such that colleges struggle to confirm FEFC income.

Second, in terms of equality, most colleges have several income streams. Any equality of funding moves should take this into account. In order to do this we need to move away from an FEFC model and move towards some form of simple full-time equivalent based on working hours and total income.

Finally, having worked in both sectors, I believe that both have a role to play in the future. Any common funding formula should aim to increase the level of funding, not drive all institutions to the lowest common denominator.

A SORTWELL East View Woodford Kettering, Northamptonshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today