Get under the spin of advisers

21st July 2000 at 01:00
I READ Michael Barber's speech to some foundation in Washington (TES, July 7) with a growing sense of disbelief. Clearly, he must actually believe his own spin. Most teachers and school leaders see things rather differently.

Yet during that period when the state education system was being systematically undermined and continually denigrated by the Conservatives, one was grateful to know that there was one government adviser who was not a complete fool or an outright charlatan.

Now that our New Tory government is so enthusiastically demonstrating its own commitment to imposed solutions, increasing divisiveness, simplistic slogans and tabloid concepts, there are one or two questions which its chief education guru might care to ponder: Why hasn't the Government begun to address the issue of our iniquitous admissions system designed to ensure that "to him that hath shall be given, and from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath"?

Why do so many Government policies - in particular "Excellence in Cities" - seem designed to increase this gulf still further?

What is the difference between diversity and selection?

If secondary schools are so bad at key stage 3, how come key stage 4 results improve year on yar?

Why does the Government declare policies as successful when they have scarcely begun to be implemented ("Excellence in Cities" again)?

Why are we once more in the throes of a teacher-supply crisis?

Why are teachers yet again taking industrial action in a way that threatens the day-to-day efficiency of schools, never mind their ability to cope with the next cunning wheeze emanating from Downing Street?

Why does the Government promote ability-setting right the way down to the nursery when no one has ever been able to demonstrate its efficacy?

Why do Government supporters persist in peddling the myth that there are significant differences in the outcomes of "similar schools" when Barber's former colleague, Harvey Goldstein, calculates the real difference to be around 2 per cent?

Finally, since Professor Barber is so sure that he knows all the answers, why doesn't he go and improve a school? He could take David Blunkett and Estelle Morris with him. I understand there are already several suitable vacancies at "fresh start" schools, and we can confidently predict that more will arise in due course.

Phil Taylor

Headteacher

Stamford high school

Mossley Road

Ashton-under-Lyne, Tameside


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now