Ghost of scandals past

24th October 2003 at 01:00
Yet again, the spectre of another franchising scandal looms over colleges.

Whatever the outcome of investigations by police and other officials into the training operations of Sandwell college (reported on page 1), it still adds up to bad news for the whole sector.

Even if the fault lies with private companies overclaiming for work carried out under contract to colleges, that still leaves further education in a mess.

Inevitably, there will be questions:

* Why did the colleges not spot it?

* Who allowed the excessive claims to go through unchecked?

* Where was the quality control?

* And, most worrying, what must be done about it?

Cast your mind back to the mid-1990s.

The franchising scandals, such as those involving Halton college, rocked the sector and left a trail of red tape, bureaucracy and distrust in their wake. Colleges are only now pulling free of that mess. It took the FE FocusAssociation of Colleges' campaign against red tape, an official inquiry into bureaucracy-busting and the drafting of the report "Trust in FE" to do it.

Franchising was created in the old days of the Further Education Funding Council, when colleges were told to go for growth and contract courses out to industry.

The pursuit of student numbers came at the cost of quality, as recently incorporated colleges were told to act like private companies.

Inspectors accused colleges of doing little more than paying for private training from the public purse - without adding significant value to justify it.

It was the lack of transparency over what was spent where and what learners really got out of it that caused most trouble.

Any latter-day suggestions of similar scandal could not come at a worse time - on the eve of the next comprehensive spending review and with a rethink by the Department for Education and Skills of what powers college governors should continue to hold.

The Learning and Skills Council insists that it alert spolice as part of "routine procedure" whenever such allegations of a misuse of public funds arises.

That is certainly true, but the LSC will also be told by politicians that it must deal with the issue, close the loopholes and clamp down on any potential abuses.

Colleges must now act swiftly, through their lead organisations such as the AoC, to reassure politicians, policy-makers and the police that draconian measures are not needed.

Otherwise, there will be renewed distruct and discontent, with colleges backing away from ambitious plans to involve private providers in their work - just as we saw after Halton.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today