Give parent choice a chance

13th August 2004 at 01:00
Philip Collins offered a more convincing argument than Professor John Howson in their excellent debate last week (TES, Summer Debate, July 30).

Of course we would all wish, with Professor John Howson, that "all children should be guaranteed a quality education". Some would agree with him that central planning, in particular of teacher numbers and types of secondary school, is the way to achieve that goal. But even those people, I think, would recognise that 15 years of ever more detailed planning has failed to do that job.

Philip Collins's pragmatic view, that choice should be given the chance to raise standards where planning has not, is hard to dispute.

I would disagree, however, with his call to rule out selection. Wouldn't parents have more choice if the schools on offer included a number specialising in different levels of academic ability?

Andrew Haldenby Director of research REFORM 45 Great Peter Street London SW1

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today