Grammars, not sets, are barbarous

28th March 2003 at 00:00
Professor Ball is wrong about setting (TES, March 14). Setting is merely a strategy which helps teachers to cope. As my PGCE tutor, Professor Ted Wragg, pointed out recently, even he found mixed-ability teaching difficult. More ordinary mortals find it utterly overwhelming.

But the middle classes do commit educational "barbarism" by sending their children to grammar schools and moving house to be near schools that score well in the league tables.

Unfortunately, the tables have been a godsend to those who want to ensure that their offspring will have as little contact as possible with children from less privileged social classes.

Unlike many inspectors and government ministers, most middle-class parents have little doubt that schools score well in tests and examinations only if they are attended by sufficient numbers of bright children.

The only way to stop the middle classes from perpetuating this kind of "barbaric" social exclusion is to have nothing but inclusive comprehensive schools.

Masha Bell 24 Filleul Road Wareham, Dorset

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today