Grouping gripe

5th April 2013 at 01:00

I was disappointed that the TESpro debate on ability group teaching did not seem to want to discuss why successive governments have supported teaching in ability groups ("Do setting and streaming work?", 29 March).

A member of the present government has pointed out that only one vote in 60 affects the outcome of a general election - and that these voters tend to be middle class and middle ground. This means that governments make the political judgement that the "parents who matter" are the sort who don't want to see their middle-class child in the same teaching group as some low-ability, working-class child who may have a behavioural problem. The solution is for these low-ability students to be separated. This means that, despite research that tends to suggest that mixed-ability grouping is generally more successful than grouping by ability, we are given the impression that setting beats all.

Mike Rath, Barnstaple.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today