Hard choices;Correction;Letter

3rd April 1998 at 01:00
Careless rewriting of my article last week, without any consultation, has vitally distorted its meaning. You have me saying that "The Secretary of State welcomes our interim report - and its recommendations that 5 per cent of curriculum time should be taken up with citizenship education - but he will reserve his decision until July".

The sentence in parenthesis was lifted up from a sentence that said that two sub-committees will set out learning objectives that are "to produce something that can be done within (sic) 5 per cent of curriculum time including outside activities", and then when I wrote "this will threaten no existing subjects whatever, it will be a matter of adjustment not hard choice", that you simply cut.

BERNARD CRICK, Chairman, Advisory Group on the Teaching of Citizenship and Democracy, Newcombe House, 45 Notting Hill Gate, London W11

* The Editor writes: we are sorry if our attempts to clarify Professor Crick's article resulted in any distortion of his intended meaning.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today