Hard choices;Correction;Letter

3rd April 1998 at 01:00
Careless rewriting of my article last week, without any consultation, has vitally distorted its meaning. You have me saying that "The Secretary of State welcomes our interim report - and its recommendations that 5 per cent of curriculum time should be taken up with citizenship education - but he will reserve his decision until July".

The sentence in parenthesis was lifted up from a sentence that said that two sub-committees will set out learning objectives that are "to produce something that can be done within (sic) 5 per cent of curriculum time including outside activities", and then when I wrote "this will threaten no existing subjects whatever, it will be a matter of adjustment not hard choice", that you simply cut.

BERNARD CRICK, Chairman, Advisory Group on the Teaching of Citizenship and Democracy, Newcombe House, 45 Notting Hill Gate, London W11

* The Editor writes: we are sorry if our attempts to clarify Professor Crick's article resulted in any distortion of his intended meaning.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now