Have you noticed?

19th January 2001 at 00:00
We nearly caught a performance-management adviser, but had to throw him back. My head objected to the Cambridge Education Associates candidate because he was a man (well, nobody's perfect, after all) and she didn't like his name - which seemed perfectly good reasons to me.

Her third objection - and this was the clincher - was that we are a small rural primary and he was head of a large urban secondary.

We have come a long way from CEA's original rash promise that they would send us a list of candidates to choose from, untainted by any connection with our county, le alone our school.

We can reject the adviser, but fear we may now go to the back of the queue. This means an appointment in April, rather than December as promised.

But my head feels it is essential to the credibility of the performance-management process that her targets should be set before she sets them for the staff. We simply can't wait now until the spring.

Perhaps this was the point of the "role-play" session in the performance-management training for governors. One of us should pretend to be an adviser - and then send our invoice to the CEA.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today