Heads fear two-tier funding in opt-out row

21st February 1997 at 00:00
Biddy Passmore finds schools in one London borough are facing a Pounds 100,000 anomaly. Secondary heads in the London borough of Enfield are protesting at the possible creation of a two-tier service because grant-maintained schools there have been allocated an extra Pounds 100,000 each next year.

The heads say the discrepancy, which has been thrown up by the complex workings of the Common Funding Formula, could scupper the hitherto good relations between local authority and GM schools in the borough. "If this continues, I can't believe the authority would retain its secondary schools for long," said one head.

Irene Byard, head of Enfield County Girls' School, pointed out that a boys' GM school, Enfield Grammar, was "just across the alley". "I've just had to write to parents explaining why their sons are going to get more than their daughters," she told The TES.

The Labour-controlled council, meanwhile, has condemned the allocation for GM schools as "unfair, divisive and inequitable" - but is obliged to implement it. The council is now combing its budget to see if it can find the estimated Pounds 1.66 million needed to bring the budgets of its 12 local authority secondaries up to the level of the five GM schools.

The difference results from the new way in which the Funding Agency for Schools (FAS) calculates the sum GM schools in an area should receive. Under the Common Funding Formula, this is based on the standard spending assessment for schools in each local authority, minus a sum to cover services like special needs still provided by the council (the so-called "top slice").

From April, the way of calculating the "top slice" has been changed, notably by basing the sum for special needs on national unit costs rather than local figures. Since Enfield spends well above average on pupils with special needs, its "top slice" has accordingly been reduced from 17 to 13 per cent of the schools budget and GM schools allocated their share of a larger total. This will give the borough's five GM schools an extra Pounds 486,000 next year.

Achilleas Georgiu, the council's chair of education, said it was "illogical and ridiculous" to base local assessments on national averages. The council points out that it faces high and growing demands on its SEN services and that Enfield, although technically an outer London borough, has substantial "inner city" areas with their associated problems.

John Salisbury, head of Aylward School and headteacher representative on the council's education committee, said the issue was not one of inadequate funding for Lambeth schools, but of unfairness between the two sectors. Pounds 100,000 was the equivalent of almost four members of staff, he pointed out.

GM heads share their local authority colleagues' outrage. Geoffrey Mills, head of the 1,250-pupil Latymer School, a grant-maintained grammar, said: "We all deplore two-tier funding."

If the borough does not find the money to match the funding level of GM schools, the gap between the two sectors could get wider.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today