Home guard

13th April 2007 at 01:00
Annette Taberner Sheffield, and 25 others from across Britain

As qualified educationists and parents of home-educated children, we were concerned to read your article, "35,000 lost to schooling" (TES, March 30).

The law places the responsibility for a child's education on parents.

Some fulfil this responsibility through school, where there is a nationally defined curriculum, age-related targets, a testing schedule and the monitoring of outcomes.

Most teachers know that this "one size fits all" system has difficulty accommodating some children's needs. Parents who educate at home are freed from many of the constraints in the school system.

Sadly, too often those employed to "inspect" home education are proponents of the schools model, with closed minds, no training, a poor understanding of the legislation and a great deal of "baggage".

It does not have to be like this. In some authorities there is good practice and a constructive partnership between home educators and the organisations that represent them.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now