Home guard

13th April 2007 at 01:00
Annette Taberner Sheffield, and 25 others from across Britain

As qualified educationists and parents of home-educated children, we were concerned to read your article, "35,000 lost to schooling" (TES, March 30).

The law places the responsibility for a child's education on parents.

Some fulfil this responsibility through school, where there is a nationally defined curriculum, age-related targets, a testing schedule and the monitoring of outcomes.

Most teachers know that this "one size fits all" system has difficulty accommodating some children's needs. Parents who educate at home are freed from many of the constraints in the school system.

Sadly, too often those employed to "inspect" home education are proponents of the schools model, with closed minds, no training, a poor understanding of the legislation and a great deal of "baggage".

It does not have to be like this. In some authorities there is good practice and a constructive partnership between home educators and the organisations that represent them.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today