Honest debate

22nd March 1996 at 00:00
The debate about parental choice of schools, and how it affects senior members of the Labour party and its hangers-on, needs to be a bit more honest.

Most of those who argue for parental choice do it for social, not educational reasons. Whether exercised in favour of independent schools, grant-maintained schools, or "more favourably situated" comprehensives, it is a device which enables white middle-class parents to ensure that their children are educated in the company of the children from a similar background.

However much disadvantaged schools improve their performance, they will never be "good enough" for these parents, because they will always contain too many children from working-class or ethnic-minority backgrounds.

J W BATESON Principal, Hillcrest School and Community College Netherton, Dudley West Midlands

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a TES/ TESS subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today