How examination `keeps the poor in their place'

12th December 2014 at 00:00
Replace tests with records of achievement, philosopher urges

There can be no social mobility as long as school exams continue, because the current system allows the social elite to reinforce its position of dominance, according to a leading education philosopher.

Exams are nothing more than "devices deliberately installed to help keep the better off where they are", says John White, one of the most senior academics at the UCL Institute of Education.

Since 1900, the dominance of the upper and middle classes has been threatened by the "mass of ordinary people below", Professor White writes in his new book Who Needs Examinations?

Prime minister David Cameron has called for a Britain where "no matter where you come from, what god you worship, the colour of your skin, what community you belong to", people are able to reach the top of their chosen professions, Professor White writes.

But the academic says that this "ladder philosophy" allows some people to progress up the social scale while - provided that there are still plenty of good jobs for children from wealthier families - doing nothing to threaten the existing social order.

However, he added, as well-paid jobs for graduates become increasingly scarce, it is people "less well-cushioned by parental wealth and connections" who are "likely to lose out".

"Better-off families are likely to do what they can to ensure that their children end up at the top end of the hourglass, and do not slip down towards the bottom," Professor White says. "We can expect an intensification of stratagems to give them favourable treatment in the examination stakes."

It is the exam system - rather than exams themselves - that is particularly at fault, he claims. This system gives higher priority to the more abstract and theoretical subjects, in which pupils from educated backgrounds have a natural advantage. It also allows wealthy parents to move to favourable catchment areas, buy in additional coaching or send their children to private schools.

"But, if all of these and other such advantages were done away with, would there still be any point in retaining the examination at all?" Professor White writes. "It would, by definition, no longer have its old rationale as an instrument of class power.

"Examinations.are not necessary to motivate students to learn, to provide a record of their work, to enable universities and employers to select entrants, to show how well a school is doing."

In their place, Professor White recommends introducing an ongoing record of achievement, or student profile, which records pupils' progress throughout their school career. This could be used to collate information not only about children's formal knowledge but also about their practical and personal skills.

"Employers should be able to search web-based applications for the qualities and achievements they are looking for," he says. "Since many, perhaps most, employers are looking for more than academic qualifications, they should welcome the possibility to trawl for skills, enterprise and other personal qualities of interest."

But Tim Oates, a senior official at Cambridge Assessment, which oversees the OCR exam board, described Professor White's argument as "extremely confused".

"I can use a kitchen knife to prepare fine food or I can use it to kill my partner," he said. "The fact that kitchen knives are used in violent acts against people doesn't mean that we should get rid of kitchen knives.

"I'm not naively saying that public examinations aren't value-laden. But examinations provide a public institution of awarding, which is amenable to public scrutiny. It's essential that we have assessment, because it takes it away from arbitrary judgements, laden with prejudice. It's precisely these sorts of judgements that prevent social mobility."

Dame Joan McVittie, headteacher of Woodside High School in North London, pointed out that schools already kept a record of pupils' non-academic skills and qualities, such as teamwork and confidence.

"It's absolute nonsense to say that we should abolish examinations completely," she said. "They allow you to hold schools to account and quality-assure the education that they're giving. I don't think we're ready for this egalitarian society he's proposing."

Who Needs Examinations? is published by Institute of Education Press, priced at pound;14.99

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today