How to grasp the nettle

4th November 1994 at 00:00
Even those hardened lawyers who sit on industrial tribunals recognise that "making teachers compulsorily redundant is a most harrowing exercise for all concerned." That was the conclusion of the tribunal which heard one of the first complaints against unfair dismissal to arise under local management .

In the complaint against the governors of Horsell School, Surrey, the tribunal recognised the consequences for pupils if a school was disrupted by the tension of a badly organised redundancy exercise and the dilemma which faces the head and governors.

"The balance between on the one hand giving staff potentially at risk as much warning as possible and on the other running the risk of a long period of tension, worry and lack of morale with consequent side-effects on the performance of the staff and children is a fine balance which the governors must weigh carefully."

But once all the avenues for avoiding redundancy have been exhausted, the nettle of compulsory redundancy must be grasped by the governing body. Objective criteria for selection are vital. The Horsell tribunal believed that instances where selection for redundancy could be based on straightforward objective criteria such as "no teaching post available" or "curriculum needs" are rare and that staffing committees might wish to draw up a much more comprehensive list of considerations including: special subject requirements; length of service; seniority; expertise; lack of qualifications to teach at certain ages; or a capacity to switch between subjects or age groups.

Such criteria should be "factual matters capable of verification one way or the other and above all capable of being assessed by governors who may not have a detailed knowledge of the curriculum."

The tribunal also thought heads of department should be involved and for their recorded comments and recommendations to be included in the process.

If choices had to be made between teachers who were very closely matched on such objectively assessable criteria, "it may be that more controversial, qualitative judgments may have to be made . . . such as attendance, record, performance, exam results and appraisals."

Such assessments should be based on routine termly assessments rather than appraisals carried out against a background of impending redundancies. The tribunal also underlined the importance of consulting unions on the proposed criteria.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today