How valid is 5-14 data?

13th March 2009 at 00:00

Andrew Sutherland makes interesting claims about the unreliability of 5-14 assessments (February 27).

One means of assessing test reliability is to measure (on a 0-1 scale) how well the results on one test correlate with the results on another test.

In 2007, I and a group of my then colleagues in the University of Strathclyde collected 5-14 national assessment data on 517 young people. We found (on the 0-1 scale) that the reading scores had a correlation of 0.9 with the writing scores; and that the maths scores had correlations of 0.8 both with the reading scores and with the writing scores.

On that evidence, 5-14 scores do have a moderate to high degree of reliability. Pairs of tests, where one or other or both is or are unreliable, simply do not exhibit high inter-test correlations.

The question of validity (that is, exactly what it is that these data are measuring) is another matter.

Ian Smith, vice-principal (learning and teaching), UHI Millennium Institute, Ness Walk, Inverness.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now