How valid is 5-14 data?

13th March 2009 at 00:00

Andrew Sutherland makes interesting claims about the unreliability of 5-14 assessments (February 27).

One means of assessing test reliability is to measure (on a 0-1 scale) how well the results on one test correlate with the results on another test.

In 2007, I and a group of my then colleagues in the University of Strathclyde collected 5-14 national assessment data on 517 young people. We found (on the 0-1 scale) that the reading scores had a correlation of 0.9 with the writing scores; and that the maths scores had correlations of 0.8 both with the reading scores and with the writing scores.

On that evidence, 5-14 scores do have a moderate to high degree of reliability. Pairs of tests, where one or other or both is or are unreliable, simply do not exhibit high inter-test correlations.

The question of validity (that is, exactly what it is that these data are measuring) is another matter.

Ian Smith, vice-principal (learning and teaching), UHI Millennium Institute, Ness Walk, Inverness.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today