If only they were microwaves

1st November 1996 at 00:00
I was incensed by the letters from Gillian James (the head of a grant-maintained school) and Emrys Batchelor (TES, September 27).

Ms James writes about having "greater choice about earmarked funds-and greater funds", but does not mention that this is to the detriment of schools who choose to stay within local education authority control. Surely, the least all schools should expect is greater choice about earmarked funds and greater funds, irrespective of whether they are GM or funded through the LEA.

Emrys Batchelor suggests that schools due for an Office for Standards in Education inspection should take a leaf from the book of industry and institute regular internal audits. The difficulty is that the agenda of OFSTED is not necessarily one a school would wish to use.

In addition, Mr Batchelor likens schools to industries, suggesting that we should be able to consistently produce quality products (pupils) and services (education). Again, we are not talking about the same thing - microwave ovens or cars, for instance, are much easier to judge for quality than pupils.

SHEILA GIBBON 40 Buttermere Road North Shields, Newcastle-upon-Tyne

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today