If social mobility relied on grammars, it would be at a standstill

17th July 2009 at 01:00
Letter to the editor

Stephen Pollard might inform himself better if he actually looked at the current reality of a wholly selective area such as Kent (Grammars: working-class pupils' last hope, July 10). Working-class children do not get a look-in at the grammar schools here. The 11-plus test is taken in September of Year 6 - so it is a 10-plus test. Does Mr Pollard believe that testing children at 10 years old is reliable or valid?

Many parents spend vast amounts of money on private tutoring or private primary education to ensure that their child passes the test. The wage packet of parents is the biggest determinant of who gets into a grammar school. Meanwhile, 70 per cent of Kent's pupils begin secondary school as "failures" and go to secondary moderns. Over a third of Kent secondary schools fall below the Government's 30 per cent threshold for GCSE results.

Social selection and educational apartheid is reinforced by the grammar school system in Kent. Mr Pollard is living in la-la land if he thinks otherwise.

Rebecca Matthews, Kent parent.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now