Ifs and buts of textbook research;Letter

16th April 1999 at 01:00
YOUR report ("Least able spurned over textbooks") on the recent Keele research into the use of textbooks (TES, April 9) emphasises the highlow attaining school dimension. While this is both newsworthy and potentially important, it also happens to be the least secure part of our work.

In my conversation with your reporter, I stressed the speculative nature of this theme. For virtually all of the possible explanations of the suggested "textbook discrimination" I referred her to the extremely interesting work started by David Lambert at the London University Institute of Education. I also made it clear that the Keele work has been carried out by my colleague Michael Johnson and that he, not I, is the authoritative source of further comment and interpretation.

I apologise if this appears to be a bit pedantic, but the "ifs" and "buts" of research are rather important, as are acknowledgments of the work of fellow researchers.

Professor Margaret Maden Keele University, Staffordshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today