Ifs and buts of textbook research;Letter

16th April 1999 at 01:00
YOUR report ("Least able spurned over textbooks") on the recent Keele research into the use of textbooks (TES, April 9) emphasises the highlow attaining school dimension. While this is both newsworthy and potentially important, it also happens to be the least secure part of our work.

In my conversation with your reporter, I stressed the speculative nature of this theme. For virtually all of the possible explanations of the suggested "textbook discrimination" I referred her to the extremely interesting work started by David Lambert at the London University Institute of Education. I also made it clear that the Keele work has been carried out by my colleague Michael Johnson and that he, not I, is the authoritative source of further comment and interpretation.

I apologise if this appears to be a bit pedantic, but the "ifs" and "buts" of research are rather important, as are acknowledgments of the work of fellow researchers.

Professor Margaret Maden Keele University, Staffordshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now