Incompatibility is the name of the game

9th February 1996 at 00:00
Will the new inspection friendly arrangements be more primary-friendly than before? Bill Laar reports.

We can't go on denying it. Like some royal couple, whose betrothal is the outcome of constitutional design, primary education and OFSTED inspection are pretty well incompatible. Fine apart, in their own way, they become a source of mutual recrimination and public scandal once they are shackled together.

So, primary education is increasingly pilloried for failing teachers and under-achieving children; OFSTED is dismissed as insensitive and negative. All this, despite heroic efforts to adjust to each other.

The truth is they are ill-matched for one great reason that we somehow contrive to ignore. It is this: our model of primary education is still largely organised and resourced within the elementary school concept of a single teacher responsible for the education of a whole class group. But that was for another time, when perceptions of cognitive and developmental diversity were less urgent and curricular expectations less demanding. Today, this organising concept consigns primary schools to an overwhelming, perhaps impossible, task in relation to the national curriculum. In this respect they are programmed to fail. Inspection, in its turn, no matter how liberal or enlightened it strives to be, can only record what is evident, or be evasive in judgment. One indication of the inevitable distortions and misrepresentations that result is the current mythology that primary teachers, engaged with up to 10 complex subjects, are less competent than secondary colleagues with responsibility for a couple.

Perhaps we should occupy ourselves less with the terrors of OFSTED and take a long, hard look at the truly urgent issues in primary education today: * An inappropriate organising and resourcing structure;

* Class sizes that increasingly constrain opportunity for sustained critical interaction between the pupil and a competent adult;

* The failure to recruit and retain sufficient capable staff in many urban schools;

* The need to secure universal literacy at an early stage.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today