Inefficient game of chase the email

6th August 2004 at 01:00
The General Teaching Council for England sent me a letter demanding its fee for 2003-4 (which has been paid by salary deduction).

On the letter is an email address: to which I sent an email to explain that the fee had been paid. An automatic reply arrived saying: "We are not able to respond to or act upon any specific queries sent to this inbox." It gave another email address ( where "your query will be handled personally and you will receive a further response".

I hoped my original email would be handled personally as I guess it's fairly important that I remain registered. An example of GTC efficiency?

Simon Midgley

63 Bankside Lane

Bacup, Lancashire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today