Infants' history labelled as well-intended deceit

9th February 2007 at 00:00
History should not be taught to pupils under the age of six, to avoid creating a dumbed-down fantasy that bears no relation to historical events, an academic has said. Denis Hayes, professor of primary education at Plymouth university, claims that key stage 1 pupils are taught a sanitised version of history that disguises the harsh realities of the world.

Writing in the journal Primary History, he said: "It is one thing to ask granny and grandpa to come into school and tell children about being evacuated and quite another to share with them the deep anxiety of leaving home."

Professor Hayes said historical events could not be separated from their impact on people.

"In no other subject does such well-intended deceit take place," he added.

"What sort of foundation is that to give our children?"

But Chris Davis, of the National Primary Headteachers' Association, insists that young children are capable of hearing about unpleasant experiences.

"There's violence and unpleasantness in fairy tales," he said. "Children can cope with that kind of information. It's unlikely to cause them trauma.

It would be a disaster to exclude all historical stories. Children lap up more at that age than at any other time."

At five, children start learning about the lives of familiar people in the recent past, as well as famous people and events in the more distant past.

And the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority suggests that six-year-olds should be taught about the great fire of London, the Vikings and Florence Nightingale.

Professor Hayes said that, while primary teachers could use fictionalised stories to help pupils understand such topics, this must be converted into fact-based understanding by later teachers.

But he warned that: "This betrayal of innocence runs the risk of bewildering children as they suddenly become aware that much of what previously passed for history was a deliberately fictionalised and distorted account."

Nicholas Tucker, a child psychologist, said: "Things have to be presented to children in child-like terms, otherwise they won't understand them. They fill in the details later."

Jacqui Dean, director of the Nuffield primary-history project, said:

"Children learn about history being a process of inquiry and build on that as they get older. Teachers can prevent misunderstandings if they teach well."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today