Inspection ire

2nd December 1994 at 00:00
I have just received our small school's Office for Standards in Education report. There are, of course, issues to be addressed, but on the whole, I am pleased with the report - ethos, and spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, relationships within and outside the school are mainly good; management is sound.

The curriculum subjects, apart from maths in both early years and key stage 1, which we are addressing anyway, give little cause for concern. "The quality of education is generally sound throughout the school."

Given the above, why do we then have to be told that "the overall standard of teaching is higher" in one department than the other? Why does OFSTED require this nasty and unnecessary comparison in a two-class school? Morale was high until OFSTED arrived. Is this the way to raise standards?


Providence Cottage

Curtisden Green, Kent

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today