Inspection review denied bold head

6th November 1998 at 00:00
Ministers do not plan radical changes in the inspection system they inherited from the Conservatives, chief inspector Chris Woodhead, said this week.

Apart from introducing "lighter-touch" inspections for good schools, the Government is not engaged in a major review of the Office for Standards in Education, he told a London conference organised by the National Union of Teachers and the Demos think tank.

Mr Woodhead's insistence that ministers intend to retain the present system followed fierce criticism of school inspections from Doug McAvoy, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers.

In opposition, Labour had suggested it might stop using privatised inspection teams.

The chief inspector said: "To the best of my knowledge . . . there is no political intention to change the OFSTED inspection of schools."

He rejected the NUT's proposal that schools could evaluate themselves as long as this was combined with an external review.

The NUT is complaining in its submission to the Commons education select committee enquiry into the work of OFSTED that much of the Pounds 150 million spent on inspection is probably wasted.

In addition, it argues, inspections have created a system in which schools and teachers prepare for evaluation out of fear rather than enthusiasm.

The union's general secretary, Mr McAvoy said the fact that OFSTED has a role in appraising the performance of teachers as part of a school inspection was "sinister" in the light of the Government's plans to introduce performance-related pay.

Professor John MacBeath of the Quality in Education Centre at Strathclyde University, said his research showed the value to schools of embarking on self-review. In most cases, it had helped raise teachers' morale.

However, Mr Woodhead told the conference that a recent OFSTED study had shown that two-thirds of the problems discovered during inspection of secondary schools had not been anticipated by schools. In primaries, the proportion was three-quarters.

The prime function of inspection, he said, was to provide accountability to parents. No self-evaluation by schools could have the currency of OFSTED reports.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now