Inspections come rain or shine

15th December 2006 at 00:00
Your article on Ofsted's inadequate use of statistical evidence ("Verdict on inspectors: inadequate", TES, December 1) was very revealing. But there is another aspect of inspection that would also bear deeper scrutiny; namely whether the time of year at which an inspection is carried out has any bearing on the outcome.

No doubt, in Ofsted's ivory towers standards of education are uniformly good or bad throughout the year. But the real world just isn't like that.

Any teacher knows that a secondary school that is the epitome of calm, purposeful learning during a sunny week in September can turn into a struggle to maintain order in a wet, windy week at the end of November.

Ofsted could, of course, provide ample evidence that this hypothesis is untrue simply by publishing the proportion of secondary schools placed in each category according to the month in which they were inspected.

My money would be on November and February coming out worst. Maybe The TES could use the Freedom of Information Act to elicit this information for 2005-06, the first year of the new inspection regime?

Tony Toubkin Carnforth, Lancashire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today