Inspectors caught on grapevine

2nd June 2000 at 01:00
AN underground network is sharing intelligence on school inspectors among headteachers and heads of departments.

Schools are passing on information of their experiences and commenting on the likes and dislikes of particular inspectors.

Some are now even finding ways of objecting to inspection team members, with the most common cause cited as a professional or social connection with the school.

Information is gleaned from the curriculum vitae of inspection teams that are routinely sent to schools. Heads follow up with questions about previous visits and then reach for the phone.

A private discussion group is about to be set up on the National Association of Head Teachers website for heads to file their own inspection reports. Complaints will be lodged with the schools inspectorate following consistent concerns about teams or individual inspectors.

This week, Mick Brookes, president of the NAHT- which wants inspection based on self-assessment - likened the present Office for Standards in Education regime to the Spanish Inquisition.

David Hart, the association's general secretary, said: "It is time for OFSTED to be accountable in the way that schools are requird to be accountable."

Details of the schools' grapevine emerged the week after Martin Stephen, high master of Manchester Grammar School, called in The TES for national league tables of inspectors.

Heads in Hampshire regularly use the council's intranet to ex-change inspection views. About three years ago, the county backed complaints made by three primary schools about the same team.

Essex head Terry Creissen said: "There is a grapevine and it's very important. But some teams are good in one school and bad in another. I had a call from a Cambridgeshire head saying 'I hear you had so and so as an inspector. What are they like, what's the agenda?' They put the school in serious weaknesses. I'm still in touch with the head."

Challenges to individual members of the teams are made to either the registered inspector or the contractor, rather than OFSTED.

Only 3 to 4 per cent of all inspections prompt formal complaints from the school, and most are tackled directly by OFSTED. Last year just five cases went to the independent adjudicator.

OFSTED was not surprised to hear of the grapevine. "It is not something we could stop or object to," a spokesman said.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now