Inspectors on the defensive

27th November 1998 at 00:00
YOUR REPORT (TES, Diary, November 13) cites the Office for Standards in Education's defensiveness in the face of the House of Commons Education and Employment Committee inquiry.

In an article in the Daily Telegraph, chief inspector Chris Woodhead urged the committee to reject anecdotal evidence. Has it not occurred to him that it is the basis of his framework for school inspections, a cornerstone of the inspection of local authorities? As long as school inspections depend on inspectors observing classroom practice and writing up anecdotes of what they have seen, and LEA inspections depend on anecdotes of LEA practice reported in private by heads, there will be endless dispute about the validity of the process.

Why do schools and LEAs so often appear to fail to identify their own weaknesses? Is it beyond the wit of OFSTED to develop self-assessment that becomes effective in raising standards and gaining public confidence?

Andrew Collier General secretary Society of Education Officers Boulton House 17-21 Chorlton Street Manchester

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today