Inspectors on the defensive

27th November 1998 at 00:00
YOUR REPORT (TES, Diary, November 13) cites the Office for Standards in Education's defensiveness in the face of the House of Commons Education and Employment Committee inquiry.

In an article in the Daily Telegraph, chief inspector Chris Woodhead urged the committee to reject anecdotal evidence. Has it not occurred to him that it is the basis of his framework for school inspections, a cornerstone of the inspection of local authorities? As long as school inspections depend on inspectors observing classroom practice and writing up anecdotes of what they have seen, and LEA inspections depend on anecdotes of LEA practice reported in private by heads, there will be endless dispute about the validity of the process.

Why do schools and LEAs so often appear to fail to identify their own weaknesses? Is it beyond the wit of OFSTED to develop self-assessment that becomes effective in raising standards and gaining public confidence?

Andrew Collier General secretary Society of Education Officers Boulton House 17-21 Chorlton Street Manchester

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now