Isn't 'A' enough?

4th September 2009 at 01:00

In the debate about A* grades at A2 level ("What will top A-level candidates have to measure up to next?", August 28), no one seems to question the need for universities to differentiate between the rising number of pupils gaining the top grade.

But what is the educational justification for the need? Shouldn't any university be able to provide an appropriate higher education for anyone with this type of initial qualifications?

Can't Oxbridge cope with students who are "merely" of A rather than A* standard? What an indictment of its undergraduate teaching if it can't.

Professor Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today