Job-sizing: who should take the blame?

27th October 2006 at 01:00
In last week's TESS, Joan Fenton highlighted the fact that Peter Peacock finally acknowledged that job-sizing did headteachers no favours and has had serious repercussions in relation to recruitment of new heads.

Perhaps unintentionally, certainly inaccurately, her article implied that the blame should rest with the Scottish Executive. As Greg Dempster, general secretary of the Association of Heads and Deputes in Scotland, pointed out in a letter the week before, job-sizing and its implications can't be laid solely at the door of the executive.

The Educational Institute of Scotland was, and is, in the driving seat in national negotiations, so it is only right that the bulk of the creditblame should go to them.

Combined with the fact that the EIS will always take the part of classroom teachers in any dispute with managers - even if that manager is an EIS member - it astounds me that the EIS has any headteacher or depute members left.

Bill Milligan


Dalmilling Primary

South Ayrshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a TES/ TESS subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order today