Just cut the ... bureaucracy

5th July 2013 at 01:00

"Notable researchers" can prove anything. If "end-of-course tests ... discriminate against girls" then, by the same token, continuous assessment must discriminate against boys. At least "big bang" exams mean less non-stop pressure and more chance of enjoying a social life ("What has Gove got against girls?", Letters, 28 June). The way to deal with these "robust equality impact assessments" is to repeal the laws that require them and save teachers' time and nerves. As for sport - how many sports are mixed or could be in practice? All schools should run sports teams and all participation should be voluntary, ensuring the greatest happiness of the greatest possible number. If boys and girls prefer different sports, no one has the right to interfere.

Mark Taha, Southeast London.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today