Justice has to be protected after Soham

9th January 2004 at 00:00
Events in Soham last summer were tragic but they were also extraordinary and exceptional. Using these events to call for changes in the laws for vetting those who work with children is seriously misguided (TES, December 19). It is crucial that allegations which do not result in criminal convictions are not included in police records.

Removing the distinction between an unproven allegation and a criminal conviction would be a serious threat to people's basic rights. False allegations are made and rumours started all the time but the notion of 'innocent until proven guilty' and the distinction between an unsubstantiated allegation and a criminal conviction are part of the foundations which underpin a civilised system of justice.

These were exceptional events, and while condemning Huntley, we must remember that his horrific actions were a one-off. Knee-jerk reactions and calls to increase the vetting procedures will only undermine the principles of universal justice.

Jenny Payne

1 Brett Manor

Brett Road

Hackney, London E8

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today