Layout over content

18th May 2007 at 01:00
Only a couple of questions in the General paper provoked comment from Maureen Valbonesi, principal teacher of chemistry at Holyrood Secondary in Glasgow.

The style of the flow chart in question 10 was more akin to that seen in the Higher paper, and its introduction was lengthier than she expected for that level and might have put some candidates off.

She also thought the layout of question 11, rather than its chemistry content, might have misled some candidates through its focus on percentages.

The Credit paper was, as expected, harder and contained more of the problem-solving associated with Higher. question 13 was a full page - half requiring close reading - but was worth only one mark. Many pupils may have skim-read it and missed out on an easy mark, she suspects.

As in the General paper, her quibble was over the layout of the questions and the amount of reading. "They are testing chemistry, not English," she said.

Overall, there was less calculation in the Credit paper than expected, though a lot was packed into one question. Acids, alkalaes and salts did not figure as prominently as in some years, she added.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today