Letters extra: Blame and shame

10th October 2003 at 01:00

Are headteachers of Stoke's 83 primary schools being automatically blamed for the fall in 11 year-olds' test results (TES, October 3)? Will any acknowledgement be made of "differing cohorts" which to we pre-national curriculum mongers equate to "a wide range of ability levels"?

Accountability needs to be re-examined. If the blame and shame culture isn't to be maintained, will those examining reasons for falls in attainment of very restricted (and restricting) test instruments be professional enough to cast their critical eyes to the broader, deeper curriculum experiences on offer?

Tim Peskett

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now