Letters extra: Curriculum crowds

12th April 2001 at 01:00

Surely it doesn't take a genius from Ofsted to come to the conclusion that children are missing out on foundation subjects in the national curriculum in primary schools. ( TES March 30).

With such importance put upon English, mathematics and science, together with the requirement to improve ICT, I find it hard to imagine that schools have more than 30 or 40 per cent of the week to teach the other curriculum areas of art, design and technology, geography, history, music, physical education and religious education.

How are schools able to teach foundation subjects to any standard in the short time available? The teaching of foundation subjects has become very difficult and can be very unrewarding; teaching three subjects well, but seven others badly. Perhaps it is this that the government needs to address if it is to achieve its teacher recruitment targets.

Perhaps the government will amend the numeracy hour: in the teaching of time, it will be shown how 36 hours make one day, and in the teaching of capacity, teachers will demonstrate how to cram two litres into a one litre pot.

Robert Hoare
Sidmouth, Devon

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today