Letters extra: In defence of different routesinto the profession

28th March 2003 at 00:00

In response to the letter from Jennifer Salt regarding the merits of the PGCE for primary teachers ( TES, March 7 2003nbsp;), nbsp;I feel I must defend the course I am undertaking.

Firstly I would like to point out that my year is made up of such an educationally, experientially and indeed socially diverse group that the contribution we will bring to primary teaching is impossible to sum up.

The course is designed to create competent, diligent teachers who have the ability to draw on their own background to deliver engaging and appropriate learning experiences to children.

I must also take issue with the assertion we are not 'dedicated' because we have chosen a differing route to our profession than Ms Salt. I can see in my class the highest level of commitment. No one embarks on a vocational course lightly, and to maintain this is the case with no reference to either research or practical experience is concerning.

May I suggest that the outcome of all education should be to develop a reflective, enquiring and open mind. This is something we should look for in all of our teachers regardless of their choice of course.

Carol Ann Smith

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today