Letters extra : Should economics be the dominant concern in educational policy-making?

17th April 2003 at 01:00

I wonder what well-validated scale Professor Fitz-Gibbon is using to measure the 'true achievement' of a degree in physics as against one in sociology ('Doubts about quality of added value scores', TES, April 11)? And where do the humanities come on her value scale?

Interestingly, the usefulness of a sociology degree can be demonstrated in this context. In the course of it one might learn about the weaknesses of the economistic concept of 'value-added', and about its current social functions; as well as being provided with the resources necessary to make a reasoned appraisal of claims about a modern society's need for science, as against humanities or social science, graduates.

A sociological education might also lead one to question whether economics should be the dominant concern in educational policy-making.

Martyn Hammersley
Professor of Educational and Social Research
The Open University

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now