Letters Extra: Why should three-part lesson rule?

15th November 2002 at 00:00

The latest Ofstedgovernment imposition is the three part lesson. Who hasn't used it at some time?

Nobody has yet explained why this is the way that ALL lessons have to be structured now.

For practical lessons, involving work over an extended time, are we not just wasting time by stopping the work of the class for a plenary session?

Someone told me some thirty years ago that if you teach for forty years your style of teaching is in fashion twice.

Is not the compulsory three part lesson just another aspect of "the king's new clothes"?

John Page
Choyce Close,

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today