Literacy hour is 'too long'

30th October 1998 at 00:00

New research suggests the national literacy hour might be more effective if it was broken up into three shorter sessions - and used different teaching methods.

Researchers from Warwick University are claiming seven-month gains in reading age using a reading framework based on psychological research.

The framework also helped summer-born children outperform their older peers in comparison schools - despite spending two fewer terms in the classroom.

"Perhaps resources and interventions should be redirected from special needs assessment and remedial work to identifying ways of raising the attainments of all children," concludes a paper on the initial findings of Essex's early reading research (ERR) project, presented to the Association of Educational Psychologists' conference in Liverpool last week by Dr Jonathan Solity.

Dr Solity reported on the first two years of the project, in which reception and Year 1 children in six Essex schools were taught using its reading framework.

The children were taught literacy three times a day in short - 10 to 15 minute - sessions. Those who were struggling received additional group sessions.

The framework teaches phonological, phonic and sight vocabulary skills, although it does not include rhyming. Forgetting is minimised through "interleaved learning" - where, for example, new words are practised alongside old ones. Daily reading and frequent assessment are other features.

The average actual age of both the children in the research project and the comparison group was six years four months. But the ERR group was an average seven months ahead on reading age - six years 10 months, compared to six years three months. They also performed better in 10 out of 11 different literacy tests.

A sample of ERR children was also compared to a similar group taking part in the National Literacy Project. Again, the test group outperformed the NLP group - this time, by six months (seven years two months compared to six years eight months).

Dr Solity, speaking after his presentation, said: "Research in psychology shows people are more likely to remember what they have to recall frequently - which is different to what the literacy hour does. Interleaved learning is a way of trying to minimise forgetting."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today