Market model is ill-fitting

21st February 1997 at 00:00
Dr James Tooley's article gave us a vision of a Conservative market-driven future for education (TES, January 31). There is value in a market approach but there are also dangers that Dr Tooley ignored.

Buying education is not like buying a pair of shoes or a restaurant, and Dr Tooley is wrong to suggest it is. It is unclear whether the consumers of education are the parents of the children. The parents may make the choice but the costs and benefits of the decision are borne by the children. If the shoes do not fit, it is easy to buy new ones: the same is not true for education.

The whole of the country gains from the education of its future workforce, not just the individual (or the individual's parent) who makes the choice. The ethos of schools helps to determine the ethos of society: to suggest that any government should be indifferent to the curriculum values in schools shows that Dr Tooley's "limited logic of the market" has taken him to something that is unacceptable.


Headteacher The Piggott School Wargrave, Berkshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now