Marking process could do better

22nd April 2011 at 01:00

An Ofqual report on the administration of the 2010 key stage 2 tests has found that the marking process was robust, but recommends 13 improvements, including identifying the original markers when sending papers for review. In 2010 around 3 per cent of papers were reviewed, with marks changed on 2,300.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today