Mind the gap

8th June 2007 at 01:00
Higher students were entering new territory this year, as the first batch to be examined on new content.

Marj Adams, principal teacher at Forres Academy, felt the exam was fair overall, in that it sampled all areas of the course. But she agreed with students who felt that some questions were not worded clearly. In the critical thinking section in particular, the wording was not always as clear as it had been in the specimen paper.

The final question in the same section, however, stimulated a "great deal of debate" among philosophy teachers; even they could not agree on whether the given argument was an example of an application of consequences.

Mrs Adams felt that questions on Descartes (above) in the epistemology section were straightforward, although some students were uncertain about the marking allocation. Colleagues in other schools had felt that question 3 on David Hume - whom her students had not covered - was too testing for Higher students.

The Intermediate 2 paper was "reasonable", although Mrs Adams felt the critical thinking section was "almost too easy". It served to illustrate the size of the gap between Intermediate 2 and Higher, she said.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today