Minion muddle

6th December 1996 at 00:00
Nowadays, when orders are issued by our educational masters, we know better than to question them. Ours is not to reason why, but to jump to it. But which way do we jump when the orders contradict one another?

Jim Rose, the Office for Standards in Education's director of inspection, has recently re-stated OFSTED's basic directive on reading: "Good teaching of reading has at its core the teaching of phonic knowledge and skill." (Letters, TES, November 8). But now the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, in its analysis of the national curriculum tests, declares that "spelling is held back by an over-emphasis on phonics" (TES, November 22).

What's all this, then? Are our educational masters having an argument? Or are they telling us that good teaching of reading is bad teaching of spelling? And, presumably, vice versa? What if we teach both well? Will we cancel ourselves out?

We must obey, but which master?


6 Alexandra Road

Biggin Hill


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today