Minion muddle

6th December 1996 at 00:00
Nowadays, when orders are issued by our educational masters, we know better than to question them. Ours is not to reason why, but to jump to it. But which way do we jump when the orders contradict one another?

Jim Rose, the Office for Standards in Education's director of inspection, has recently re-stated OFSTED's basic directive on reading: "Good teaching of reading has at its core the teaching of phonic knowledge and skill." (Letters, TES, November 8). But now the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, in its analysis of the national curriculum tests, declares that "spelling is held back by an over-emphasis on phonics" (TES, November 22).

What's all this, then? Are our educational masters having an argument? Or are they telling us that good teaching of reading is bad teaching of spelling? And, presumably, vice versa? What if we teach both well? Will we cancel ourselves out?

We must obey, but which master?


6 Alexandra Road

Biggin Hill


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now