Ministers' business spin scuttled zone flagship

24th November 2000 at 00:00
THE Government damaged the progress of its own initiative to tackle inner city underachievement, according to research by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Ministers' emphasis on business involvement in education action zones ensured that they started work in an atmosphere of hostility and suspicion with many teachers fearing their schools would be privatised, it found.

As a result of the tensions, zone directors and education authorities had to spend time and effort persuading schools that they had no reason to fear joining a zone.

The research, commissioned by the National Union of Teachers, found early zones were forced to begin more cautiously than they would have liked. Chris Kirk, a consultant for PricewaterhouseCoopers, said this had scuppered ministers' plans for them to be testbeds for educational experiments in the inner cities.

No zones had taken advantage of regulations which would have allowed them to disapply teachers' national pay and conditions or to cede their schools' powers to forums dominated by private firms, said Mr Kirk, who previously worked for the Deparment for Education and Employment on the initiative.

Doug McAvoy, NUT general secretary, said: "In education action zones, the Government created potential for teacher-led innovation. But through its ferocious spin on a lead role for business, it guaranteed a lack of confidence in the model it was proposing."

Data from the DFEE showed that educational standards rose quicker than the average in zones, but it was difficult to attribute this to an "EAZ effect" rather than to extra funding or other initiatives such as literacy and numeracy strategies, the PricewaterhouseCoopers report argues.

Teachers were divided on whether being part of a zone raised standards - more than half agreed it did while 40 per cent did not believe improvement could necessarily be attributed to the zone.

The report concluded: "A clear message for the Government is to trust teachers and others to deliver and to communicate unequivocally what it expects and why. The Government needs to think very carefully about the impact of its statements on the range of stakeholders in the process."


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now