Ministers may jettison first-term assessment

22nd September 2000 at 01:00
MINISTERS are considering delaying the first assessment of primary children until the end of reception class when some will have been in school for a year.

Primaries have been required to assess children within the first term in reception for the past two years. The assessment can take place when children are four.

Academics believe an assessment at the end of the new foundation stage (from age three to five) would be more useful. Ministers are also considering reducing the number of approved schemes used by schools.

Professor Geoff Lindsay of Warwick University, who evaluated baseline assessment for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, suggested there were difficulties comparing progress because there are 91 schemes.

"Teachers appear to be satisfied that the assessment provides them with information about the needs of the pupils in their class. However, if the purpose is also to compare progress between schools in different local authorites, that cannot be done with the existing range of schemes," he said.

His report is expected to say that most of the schemes lack evidence that they ae producing nationally reliable information about achievement.

Meanwhile an analysis of schools using Professor Peter Tymms of Durham University's assessment regime suggests reception pupils' progress varies hugely between schools. This scheme is used by 3,500 schools - 1.5 per cent of primaries.

Professor Tymms says children taught well in reception produce measurably better results in national tests for seven-year-olds. Between a quarter and a third of the difference in progress in reception is to do with the effectiveness of the teaching, he said.

Big differences were found between pupils' progress in different classes. It would appear that being part of reception class where a lot of progress is made has a long-term positive impact.

Other factors that influence success include the average ability of pupils in a class, said Professor Tymms. Classes with greater than average numbers of high achievers make greater progress.

"Teachers ought to be aware it is a more accurate predictor of the future results of those children who get high scores in the assessment," Professor Tymms said.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now