Misguided action over toxic contracts?

4th May 2012 at 01:00

You reported that Suffolk County Council suspended the head and the governing body of a school for entering into a toxic lease agreement involving laptops costing #163;5,000 each that the school believed were free ("Thousands of schools duped by 'toxic contracts'", TES, 20 April).

A better course of action would have been vigorous public support of those who were thought to have been misled and a letter to the bank with a robust refusal to pay more than the normal retail price for each computer. It would not have been an easy court action for the administrator - until the council seemed to concede everything in advance by punishing its own team.

Ian Macaulay, Former solicitor.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today