Misguided action over toxic contracts?

4th May 2012 at 01:00

You reported that Suffolk County Council suspended the head and the governing body of a school for entering into a toxic lease agreement involving laptops costing #163;5,000 each that the school believed were free ("Thousands of schools duped by 'toxic contracts'", TES, 20 April).

A better course of action would have been vigorous public support of those who were thought to have been misled and a letter to the bank with a robust refusal to pay more than the normal retail price for each computer. It would not have been an easy court action for the administrator - until the council seemed to concede everything in advance by punishing its own team.

Ian Macaulay, Former solicitor.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now